Understanding the Accuracy and Reliability of Field Sobriety Tests

Field sobriety tests are a critical component in law enforcement’s efforts to curb impaired driving. These tests are designed to assess a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities to determine if they are operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs. However, the accuracy and reliability of these tests have been subjects of considerable debate. For anyone facing charges related to impaired driving, understanding the nuances of field sobriety tests is crucial. This knowledge can significantly impact the outcome of their case, particularly if the tests were administered improperly or the results are questionable.

The Purpose and Types of Field Sobriety Tests

Field sobriety tests are standardized procedures used by police officers during traffic stops to evaluate a driver’s impairment. These tests include the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, the Walk-and-Turn test, and the One-Leg Stand test. Each test is designed to measure a driver’s coordination, balance, and ability to follow instructions, which can be impaired by alcohol or drugs. The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test involves following an object with the eyes, the Walk-and-Turn test requires walking in a straight line heel-to-toe, and the One-Leg Stand test demands standing on one leg while counting aloud.

Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Field Sobriety Tests

Despite their widespread use, the accuracy of field sobriety tests can be influenced by numerous factors. Physical conditions such as obesity, age, and injuries can affect a person’s performance on these tests, leading to false positives. Additionally, environmental conditions like uneven surfaces, poor lighting, and inclement weather can further compromise the results. Even psychological factors such as anxiety and nervousness can impair a person’s ability to perform these tests accurately. It’s important to note that these tests are subjective in nature, relying heavily on the officer’s interpretation of a driver’s performance, which can lead to bias and errors.

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test is often considered the most reliable of the field sobriety tests. It involves observing the involuntary jerking of the eye when a person looks to the side. When a person is impaired by alcohol, this jerking becomes more pronounced. However, this test is not foolproof. Certain medical conditions and medications can cause nystagmus, leading to false positives. Moreover, the accuracy of the HGN test hinges on the officer’s ability to correctly observe and interpret the eye movements, which requires substantial training and experience.

Harley Wagner

Defending West Virginia Residents for over 24 Years

The Walk-and-Turn Test

The Walk-and-Turn test is a divided attention test, which means it assesses a person’s ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. This test requires the individual to walk a straight line, heel-to-toe, turn on one foot, and walk back in the same manner. While it is designed to be straightforward, many factors can influence its outcome. Physical limitations, improper footwear, and even nervousness can cause a sober person to fail this test. Additionally, the conditions under which the test is administered, such as an uneven or slippery surface, can further affect the results.

The One-Leg Stand Test

The One-Leg Stand test requires the individual to stand on one leg while counting aloud. This test is intended to assess balance and concentration. Similar to the Walk-and-Turn test, numerous factors can impact performance. Physical impairments, age, weight, and even fatigue can cause a person to struggle with this test. Furthermore, external conditions such as an unstable surface or poor weather can also affect the outcome. As with the other field sobriety tests, the subjective nature of the officer’s assessment can introduce bias and errors.

The Role of Training and Experience

The reliability of field sobriety tests is heavily dependent on the training and experience of the administering officer. Proper training ensures that officers are well-versed in the standardized procedures and can administer the tests accurately. However, variations in training programs and individual differences in experience can lead to inconsistencies. An officer’s lack of familiarity with the tests or failure to adhere strictly to the standardized procedures can compromise the results. Moreover, officers may have inherent biases that influence their judgment, further questioning the reliability of these tests.


Harley and Heather gave me peace of mind as they walked me through the process of my DUI. Heather was so quick to answer even the smallest and probably irrelevant questions I had. I was extremely nervous to walk in the courtroom, but Harley made sure I was in and out of there in no time with the best deal I could think of. My DUI charge was reduced to a speeding ticket and some online DUI classes. Would absolutely recommend Harley and Heather if you’re ever in need of a lawyer.”

- Antea Jarazi


The Wagner Law Firm was amazing from beginning to end dealing with my case. This was my first time ever dealing with anything like this and they helped me tremendously and answered all my questions super fast. We got the best outcome possible for my case and I will be recommending Harley and Heather to anyone that’s ever in my situation."

- Savanna Cummings


Harley and Heather do not stop and are excellent at always keeping their clients up to date on the status of their case and never left wondering. They do all the work and are very well connected throughout the state. I will forever be grateful to both Harley and Heather for what they did for me,,,, they aren’t just another law firm, they are great people who truly care. Thank you."

- Clint Anderson

Legal Challenges to Field Sobriety Tests

Field sobriety tests are often contested in court, with defense attorneys scrutinizing the conditions under which the tests were administered and the qualifications of the officer conducting them. Legal challenges may focus on whether the officer followed the proper protocols and whether external factors may have affected the driver’s performance. In some cases, the defense may bring in witnesses to testify about the limitations and potential inaccuracies of field sobriety tests. These challenges highlight the importance of understanding the various factors that can influence the results and the need for a comprehensive defense strategy.

Alternative Methods of Assessing Impairment

In addition to field sobriety tests, there are other methods used to assess impairment. Breathalyzers and blood tests are commonly employed to measure blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels. While these methods are generally more accurate than field sobriety tests, they are not without their own issues. Breathalyzers can be affected by factors such as calibration errors, environmental conditions, and the presence of substances in the mouth. Blood tests, while accurate, are invasive and require proper handling and analysis to ensure reliable results. The combination of field sobriety tests with these methods can provide a more comprehensive assessment, but each method’s limitations must be considered.

The Importance of Legal Representation

For individuals facing DUI charges, having knowledgeable legal representation is crucial. An attorney can evaluate the administration and results of field sobriety tests, identify potential inaccuracies, and build a robust defense. They can challenge the validity of the tests in court, present alternative explanations for the driver’s performance, and question the officer’s training and experience. Legal representation can mean that the defendant’s rights are protected and that all aspects of the case are thoroughly examined.

Related Videos

What are the penalties for a DUI conviction?

What happens if I'm arrested for a first DUI?

The Impact of Field Sobriety Tests on Legal Outcomes

Field sobriety tests can significantly impact the outcome of DUI cases. Positive results from these tests can lead to arrest and charges, while negative results may allow the driver to avoid prosecution. However, the reliability of these tests is not absolute, and many factors can influence their accuracy. Inaccurate test results can lead to wrongful arrests and convictions, underscoring the need for a critical examination of these tests in legal proceedings. Understanding the limitations and potential errors associated with field sobriety tests is essential for achieving a fair and just outcome.

Ensuring Fairness and Accuracy in DUI Cases

The justice system must ensure fairness and accuracy in DUI cases, given the severe consequences of a conviction. This involves a careful evaluation of all evidence, including field sobriety test results. Judges and juries must be informed about the potential inaccuracies and biases associated with these tests. By scrutinizing the administration of the tests and the conditions under which they were conducted, the court can make more informed decisions. Additionally, ongoing training and standardization for law enforcement officers can help improve the reliability of field sobriety tests.

The Future of Field Sobriety Testing

Advancements in technology may offer new methods for assessing impairment, potentially reducing the reliance on traditional field sobriety tests. Research into more accurate and objective measures of impairment is ongoing, with the goal of developing tools that can reliably assess a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle safely. These advancements could lead to more reliable testing methods, reducing the potential for errors and improving the overall accuracy of impairment assessments. However, until such methods are developed and implemented, the current field sobriety tests will continue to play a critical role in DUI enforcement.

Case Results

DUI Felony 3rd Offense

Not Guilty

DUI 1st

Not Guilty

Aggravated DUI 1st

Charge Reduced

.08 DUI Causing Death

Case Dismissed

DUI Felony Fleeing / Attempted Murder by Vehicle

All Charges Dismissed

.14 Felony DUI Causing Death Case

Reduced to Misdemeanor

Defending Drivers’ Rights

Field sobriety tests are a crucial tool in law enforcement’s efforts to detect and deter impaired driving. However, their accuracy and reliability are not without question. Numerous factors can influence the results of these tests, and their subjective nature can lead to errors and bias. Understanding the limitations and potential inaccuracies of field sobriety tests is essential for anyone facing DUI charges. With the guidance of an attorney, individuals can challenge the validity of these tests.

If you or a loved one is facing DUI charges and have concerns about the accuracy and reliability of field sobriety tests, contact The Wagner Law Firm. Our dedicated team of legal professionals will provide the support and representation you need to navigate this challenging time. Contact us today for a consultation.