Understanding DUI Laws in West Virginia
Before diving into the various defense strategies, it is important to understand how DUI laws function in West Virginia. The state defines DUI as operating a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher. For drivers under the age of 21, the limit is set at 0.02%, while for commercial drivers, it is 0.04%. The state also penalizes individuals who are found driving under the influence of drugs, whether prescription, over-the-counter, or illegal substances. A DUI charge can carry significant penalties, and the severity increases if aggravating factors are present, such as a high BAC level, repeat offenses, or causing an accident while under the influence. West Virginia enforces an implied consent law, which means that by obtaining a driver’s license, you automatically consent to chemical tests if you are suspected of driving under the influence. Refusing to submit to these tests can lead to immediate penalties, including license suspension, even if you are not ultimately convicted of DUI. While the consequences of a DUI charge can be severe, the law also provides several opportunities for defendants to challenge their cases and protect their rights.Challenging the Legality of the Traffic Stop
One of the most fundamental strategies for defending a DUI charge in West Virginia is to challenge the legality of the initial traffic stop. Law enforcement officers must have reasonable suspicion to stop a driver. This means that the officer must have observed behavior that suggests the driver may be intoxicated or violating another traffic law. Common reasons for stopping a driver include swerving, speeding, running a red light, or failing to use a turn signal. However, if the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop, any evidence obtained afterward, including results from a breathalyzer or field sobriety tests, may be inadmissible in court.
Harley Wagner
Defending West Virginia Residents for over 24 Years
Questioning the Accuracy of Field Sobriety Tests
Field sobriety tests are commonly used by law enforcement to assess whether a driver is impaired. These tests include the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk-and-turn test, and the one-leg stand test. While these tests are standard, they are not infallible. Various factors can affect a person’s ability to perform these tests correctly, and as a result, these tests are often challenged in DUI defense cases. In West Virginia, a defense attorney may argue that the conditions under which the field sobriety tests were administered were unfair. For example, uneven pavement, poor lighting, inclement weather, or the individual’s physical condition may impact their performance on the test. Additionally, certain medical conditions, fatigue, or anxiety can cause a person to appear intoxicated when they are not. If it can be demonstrated that the field sobriety tests were administered improperly or that the results were compromised by external factors, the reliability of the tests may be called into question, weakening the prosecution’s case.
Harley and Heather gave me peace of mind as they walked me through the process of my DUI. Heather was so quick to answer even the smallest and probably irrelevant questions I had. I was extremely nervous to walk in the courtroom, but Harley made sure I was in and out of there in no time with the best deal I could think of. My DUI charge was reduced to a speeding ticket and some online DUI classes. Would absolutely recommend Harley and Heather if you’re ever in need of a lawyer.”
- Antea Jarazi
The Wagner Law Firm was amazing from beginning to end dealing with my case. This was my first time ever dealing with anything like this and they helped me tremendously and answered all my questions super fast. We got the best outcome possible for my case and I will be recommending Harley and Heather to anyone that’s ever in my situation."
- Savanna Cummings
Harley and Heather do not stop and are excellent at always keeping their clients up to date on the status of their case and never left wondering. They do all the work and are very well connected throughout the state. I will forever be grateful to both Harley and Heather for what they did for me,,,, they aren’t just another law firm, they are great people who truly care. Thank you."
- Clint Anderson
Disputing the Results of Breathalyzer or Blood Tests
Breathalyzer and blood tests are commonly used to determine a driver’s blood alcohol concentration, and their results can be key evidence in a DUI case. However, these tests are not always accurate, and there are several ways in which the results can be challenged. In West Virginia, breathalyzer devices must be properly maintained and calibrated regularly to ensure accurate readings. If the device used in your case was not maintained according to protocol, or if the officer administering the test did not follow the proper procedure, the results may be flawed and could potentially be thrown out. In addition to mechanical issues, factors such as medical conditions (like acid reflux) or the consumption of certain foods or medications can skew the results of a breath test. Blood tests can also be challenged based on how the sample was handled. For example, if the sample was not properly stored or if there was contamination, the results may not be valid. An experienced DUI defense attorney can scrutinize the procedures followed by law enforcement and the testing laboratory to determine whether any errors occurred that could invalidate the results.Arguing that You Were Not Driving
Another potential defense in a West Virginia DUI case is the argument that you were not actually driving the vehicle while intoxicated. For a DUI charge to be valid, the prosecution must prove that you were operating the vehicle. In some cases, individuals may be found in a parked vehicle while intoxicated, but this alone does not necessarily mean they were driving. For example, if you were sitting in your car after having consumed alcohol, but the car was not in motion and there was no intent to drive, it could be argued that you were not operating the vehicle under the influence. This defense is particularly relevant if you were not observed driving by a law enforcement officer or if there is no direct evidence showing that you were driving. Witness testimony or surveillance footage can be key in supporting this type of defense, and it may be used to cast doubt on the prosecution’s claims.Related Videos
What are the penalties for a DUI conviction?
What happens if I'm arrested for a first DUI?